[MSN] Smithsonian--'Nations Attic'--Leaking Badly

[Museum Security Network Mailing list]

Original Content at
http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_jim_free_071003_smithsonian___nation
.htm


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
October 3, 2007

Smithsonian--'Nations Attic'--Leaking Badly

By Jim Freeman

An article in (what else?) the Washington Post, Jim Grimaldi outlines the
decline and fall of yet another American institution. 


Free speech? No, the corporate and media giants have already co-opted that
one.
Freedom of the press and an independent media? Sorry, that was bought while
we were busy at the mall, by an Australian billionaire. 
Then, it's gotta be our right to be left the hell alone in our own homes.
Uh, uh. That most cherished of our rights was the first casualty of the War
on Drugs.

The institution of which I speak is not philosophical, but actual bricks and
mortar-the Smithsonian, "an educational and research institute and
associated museum complex, administered and funded by the government of the
United States and by funds from its endowment, contributions, and profits
from its shops and its magazine." Commonly called the nation's attic-a sort
of Hubble telescope of our historic past, it's in trouble.

Deteriorating Smithsonian facilities have damaged historic airplanes,
threatened collections and resulted in the leakage of tens of millions of
gallons of water at National Zoo enclosures, while cuts in security staff
have exposed artifacts in the institution's 18 museums to vandalism and
theft, the Government Accountability Office reported yesterday.

A backlog of construction and maintenance projects at the Smithsonian has
ballooned to $2.5 billion, the GAO said, in part because Smithsonian
officials insist that most facility repairs and upgrades be paid for through
federal appropriations and not private money. The government provides 70
percent of the Smithsonian's money -- $715 million last year.

Not to worry-the Congress will not let this happen. Those who stand up every
day in the halls of the House and Senate, shaking a righteous finger in the
defense of our most precious freedoms, will ride like the cavalry to the
rescue. It is, after all, a miniscule number, an amount required to fund
less than a week of war.
 
Infrastructure, that buzz-word of just a few months back, graven into the
imagery of our minds by the disaster of bridge collapse in Minneapolis, is
still on the tip of our political tongue. What more precious example of the
nation's collective infrastructure is there than the 'Smith'?' Just ask
Dianne Feinstein, frenetic Senator from California.

Feinstein has told Smithsonian officials that it is unrealistic to count on
federal funding for the upgrades and has urged them to find alternative
funding. The GAO report suggests that the Smithsonian should dip into
unrestricted trust funds, which account for 6 percent ($58 million in 2006)
of the institution's budget.

C'mon, Dianne. You expect a decades-long shortfall in major long term
maintenance needs to be made up by increasing entry fees to school-kids and
sucking harder on the gift-shop straw? That's like Minneapolis building a
toll bridge, except that the bridge that collapsed in Minnesota isn't the
treasure-trove of America.
 
Feinstein's hard line is particularly offensive in the face of a recent Wall
Street Journal article that tags Dianne for a $4 billion earmark for her
Hollywood friends. Her heart may be in San Francisco, but she's going to
make sure taxpayers leave four billion in the woods of Holly, a kind of
gifty-giveaway to her already rich local buddies. Protecting their 'view' is
part of the justification and there's no suggestion from Dianne to dip into
any Hollywood unrestricted trust funds.

Part of the sniping at the Smith is their own foolish fault. They hired a
bozo by the name of Larry Small, who had been CEO of the Federal National
Mortgage Association. That should have been a tip-off, but wasn't. 

Small bamboozled a salary in excess of $700,000, got a housing allowance of
$1.5 million and then went to work renovating the house and his office.
Unworried about leaks in the museum roofs, he and his wife flew 1st class at
Smithsonian expense and he (quite properly) angered Congress by doing all
this as the institution declined. 

But hey, compared to the thievery and excess Congress continues to fund in
Iraq every single day, the Smithsonian needs are small-potatoes and unlike
the war, they matter to America. 

A backlog of construction and maintenance projects at the Smithsonian has
ballooned to $2.5 billion, the GAO said, in part because Smithsonian
officials insist that most facility repairs and upgrades be paid for through
federal appropriations and not private money.

Officials insist on that because it's easier to get contributions for new
acquisitions and facilities than it is for tarring a roof or digging a new
storm-drain. Same for personnel. "Would you care to contribute $2 million to
salaries for our guards?" Thought not.

The number of security officers has steadily declined since May 2003 even
though the Smithsonian has opened new museums, resulting in fewer officers
to cover more space, the GAO said. At times, security alarms would ring, but
guards would be unavailable to check on them. Guards once assigned to cover
a single gallery must now cover two.

The museums suffered 35 cases of vandalism between 2005 and August this
year. Last November, officials discovered that someone had popped open older
exhibit cases and stolen several mammalian fossils at the National Museum of
Natural History. Smithsonian spokeswoman Linda St. Thomas said she did not
know the value of the fossils. St. Thomas said an outside firm has been
hired to determine if the number of guards is adequate.

St. Thomas needed an outside firm for that. No wonder some in the Congress
are wondering if anyone knows how to run the show. I'll give you a clue,
Linda-no charge. If you have 

more museum space opening and
fewer and fewer guards and 
stuff is beginning to get vandalized and stolen, 

it's a pretty good guess that the number of guards in not adequate.

Two Smithsonian officials told the GAO of "alarming 'near misses' -- events
related to inadequate facilities that could have been catastrophic,"
including a leak a year ago at the Sackler Gallery that would have destroyed
$500 million in loaned artwork if the deluge had occurred while the art was
stored there.

The leak was caused by problems with the steam system for the complex of
underground buildings near the Smithsonian Castle on the Mall. "Museum
officials stated that staff must routinely spend time each morning searching
for new leaks in order to move or cover collections to keep them safe," the
report said. "Several officials emphasized they have been lucky to avoid
major damage to the collections thus far."

Major museums have no business being run by snarky politicos who come from
the contributor crowd. There is probably no more major museum in the world
than the Smithsonian, with nineteen separate facilities and a zoo. It has
eight research centers and includes sites in New York City, Virginia,
Panama, and elsewhere, with over 142 million items in its collections. 

It deserves a major-league curator to run the show and crank up donations. 

Deals such as the recent CBS/Showtime Networks agreement only cheapen the
product. But while Feinstein's committee figures out how to punish this
behavior and threaten that malfeasance, it might look first to cleaning up
its own act. Stripping the funding while the roof falls in and priceless
exhibits become worthless, is almost as foolish as . . . as
 
. . . earmarks to the Hollywood rich or pounding money into the rat-hole
that is Blackwater.


http://www.opednews.com/maxwrite/print_friendly.php?p=opedne_jim_free_071003
_smithsonian___nation.htm